top of page

G4: Insertion of new holding company

- Sale to company in return for shares in company (query whether shares worth less)

​

- Minority interest in company owning listed shares is worth less than outright ownership of the equivalent number of shares (Battle).

- Even sale in return for 98% was thought to carry a 2.5% discount (Battle at 93).

Legislation: 

Cases: Battle v. IRC [1980] STC 86

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: 

See also:

​

Tax avoidance purpose test ​

​

The test

-Must be for bona fide commercial reasons

- Must not form part of a scheme or arrangement with a main purpose of avoiding corporation tax, capital gains tax or income tax

Legislation: TCGA s.137; s.139(5)

Cases: 

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: 

See also:

​

Bona fide commercial reasons

-Motive irrelevant.

- Bona fide commercial reasons if transaction represents a fair exchange of value.

Legislation: 

Cases: Snell v. HMRC [2007] STC 1279; Lloyd v. HMRC [2008] STC (SCD) 681

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: 

See also:

​

Mitigation is not avoidance

- Hallmark of tax avoidance is that the taxpayer reduces his liability to tax without incurring the economic consequences Parliament intended.

- Hallmark of mitigation is taking advantage of a fiscally attractive option afforded by the legislation and genuinely suffering the economic consequences.

- Choosing the most efficient means of demerger is not generally avoidance.  

- Not sufficient to point to relieving provision - must be using rather than mis-using the relieving provision. 

- A main purpose of avoiding tax altogether (e.g. by subsequently going non-resident), rather than deferring it is likely to fall foul of the rules.

- Even some deferrals may be objectionable - see Furniss v. Dawson [1984] STC 153.

Legislation: 

Cases: IRC v. Willoughby [1997] STC 995; Carvill v. IRC [2000] STC (SCD) 167; Peterson v. CIR [2005] STC 448; Snell v. HMRC [2007] STC 1279.

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: TCCR W1.4.1

See also:

​

Clearance

- Must fully and accurately disclose all facts and considerations material for the decision, otherwise clearance is void. 

Legislation: TCGA s.138; s.139(5)

Cases: 

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: 

See also:

​

CORPORATION TAX

​

- Close investment holding company always subject to main rate of CT

​

XX

Legislation: 

Cases: 

HMRC manuals: CTM60705.

Commentary: 

See also:

​

Stamp duty

​

Reconstruction relief

​

Disqualifying arrangements

XX

Legislation: 

Cases: 

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: 

See also:

Partition relief

- Person acquiring control must have held at least 25% interest for previous 3 years.

- Not sufficient that a group acquiring control have, together, held at least 25% interest for 3 years.

Legislation: FA 1986, s.77A

Cases: 

HMRC manuals: 

Commentary: TCCR W1.3.7

See also:

​

​

 © 2023 by Michael Firth, Gray's Inn Tax Chambers

bottom of page